Billbergia buchholtzii Mez, Repert. Sp. Nov. 16: 7. 1919.
This saga started in 1919 when Mez described a plant from the Berlin Botanical Garden and detail in his revision of the Bromeliaceae in 1935. This is what he said “Habitat unknown, probably East - Brazil. - I obtained examples from three different gardens under three different incorrect names. It is unanimous that it is a garden-hybrid; it is named in honour of the Garden-inspector Buchholtz, my co-worker in the cultivation of Bromeliaceae.”. What I find odd is that Mez was sure his plant was a man-made hybrid and yet Smith, 44 years later thought it was just doubtful. As such I think it safer to treat this plant under the ICNCP rules as a cultivar, and thus known as ‘Buchholtzii’
Here is the description as it appeared in Flora Neotropica 1979
Leaves to 10 in a slenderly funnelform rosette, pale green, obscurely spotted, to 4 dm long;
Sheaths large, elliptic, dark reddish above;
Blades ligulate, broadly rounded, minutely apiculate, to 6 cm wide, finely serrulate.
Scape sub-erect, slender, glabrous, shorter than the leaves;
Scape-bracts large, elliptic, acute, bright rose.
Inflorescence suberect, few-flowered, usually with a single one-flowered branch at base and else¬where simple, to 12 cm long, 8 cm in diameter, glabrous.
Floral bracts minute, triangu¬lar;
Flowers sessile, to 70 mm long.
Sepals oblong, emarginate and without a mucro, 25 mm long, green except the dark blue apex;
Petals to 50 mm long, never spiral, the part above the sepals dark blue, bearing 2 coarsely serrate scales at base;
Stamens slightly shorter than the petals;
Ovary cylindric, 20 mm long, sulcate, pale green.
Type. Berlin Hortus s n (holotype, B; photo F 11335),
No collection details were given and as Lyman Smith was later to comment this is probably of hybrid origin..
This would have been the only information about the plant known to growers in 1961 where we read in the B S Bull.11(1)12. by J A Giridlian in California.
“After Mr. Atkinson's death these plants were widely distributed by Evans & Reeves Nursery of Los Angeles under the name of B. enderi hybrids, enderi being a synonym for B. amoena which now has been identified as B. buchholtzi. Since I have three very distinct plants all of which have been identified with the same name, I call this one B. buchholtzi No1. This particular plant is a low growing, slender plant with a very brilliant orange-red bract. It has been used many times in crossing with other species to impart this bright orange coloring to its progeny, which indeed it does. These characteristics are shown in the hybrid plant under discussion because it is lower growing than any B. vittata I have ever seen, and the color of the bract is bright warm red, a color I have never encountered in the true V. vittata, no matter how variable. Also, along with other hybrid Billbergias, it has the habit of bloom¬ing more than once a year.
In hindsight it is easy to comment but botanically B. enderi has never been linked to B. amoena but more to Quesnelia lateralis a much different looking plant. BUT how can you possibly get three very distinct forms of an alleged species? I have strong suspicions that B. buchholtzii No1 is linked to ‘Wendi’ or ‘Windigig Special’ but that is another story.
In 1962 B S Bull.12(3)46. Mulford Foster wrote
B. buchholtzii - This plant does not appear in any listings of commercial growers, but Oakhurst Gardens in southern California has for sale three variations. Whether these belong under the listing of B. buchholtzii is not known. However, the plants so named are very attractive. No. 1 is a dwarf form with brilliant orange-scarlet bracts and deep blue flowers. When well established, it will have several blooming periods a year. No.2 has tall, light green foliage..rose bracts and lavender flowers. No.3 has very attractive leaves of huge size, deep green with bronze shadings and barred transversely with gray. It becomes purplish in the sun. The flowers are violet with pink bracts.
In 1968 BSB 18(1):10 Edward L McWilliams wrote about billbergias and this is what he had to say about B. buchholtzii. “This species is very similar to B. amoena but with petal blade wholly blue. The taxon is often misidentified in the trade.”
In 1979 in Flora Neotropica Lyman Smith added the following references to this taxon
Atkinson 44 (? clonotypes GH, US); New York Botanical Garden s n (? clonotypes NY, US). Reference to the 3 Herbaria quoted has revealed no reference to Atkinson 44. Its lodgement date may have given us a clue as to when and how Smith came across this specimen
It seems clear to me that Atkinson was in touch with Lyman Smith as to the true identity of B. buchholtzii but this information was forgotten by or unknown to Evans and Reeves when they purchased these plants ( See Giridlian’s article in 1961- above)
In 2000 at the World Bromeliad Conference in San Francisco there were two completely different looking plants with B. buchholtzii on the label which alerted me to a long standing problem that nobody had addressed.
Thanks to the keenness of Rodney Kline who contacted Californian growers we now know that the true B. buchholtzii is being grown by Tom Koerber but there are still other plants with this name in circulation which are incorrectly identified. The only difference I can find between the photograph and the description is the very pale pink sepals compared to green but I have noticed this discrepancy in other billbergias. This plant with its somewhat murky past has never had a photograph published to show you what to look for. This is remedied forthwith with them being on fcbs.org! This plant seems to link to ‘Buchholtzii No3’ because of its size and banded leaves. (note here that banded leaves was specifically excluded in the original description by Mez)
This investigation rang bells for me because there seems to be two forms of Billbergia ‘Breauteana’ ( Or Billbergia ‘Chas Webb’) in Australia; one with a long inflorescence which well exceeds the leaf tube and with bright red sepals, and the other with a short inflorescence that barely exceeds the leaf tube and the sepals are pale green. The second one could well be Billbergia buchholtzii and if you do have one like this it may well pay to check it against the description above! p. Notes by Butcher at Sept 2008.
Never collected from the wild and probably of hybrid origin
BiIlbergia buchholtzii Mez, Repert. Sp. Nov. 16: 7. 1919. by Butcher
This saga started in 1919 when Mez described a plant from the Berlin Botanical Garden and detail would have appeared in his revision of the Bromeliaceae in 1935, albeit in Latin. Here is the description as it appeared in Flora Neotropica 1979
No collection details were given and as Lyman Smith was later to comment this is probably of hybrid origin..
This would have been the only information about the plant known to growers in 1961 where we read in the B S Bull.11(1)12. by J A Giridlian
"After Mr. Atkinson's death these plants were widely distributed by Evans & Reeves Nursery of Los Angeles under the name of B. enderi hybrids, enderi being a synonym for B. amoena which now has been identified as B. buchholtzi. Since I have three very distinct plants all of which have been identified with the same name, I call this one B. buchholtzi No1. This particular plant is a low growing, slender plant with a very brilliant orange-red bract. It has been used many times in crossing with other species to impart this bright orange coloring to its progeny, which indeed it does. These characteristics are shown in the hybrid plant under discussion because it is lower growing than any B. vittata I have ever seen, and the color of the bract is bright warm red, a color I have never encountered in the true V. vittata, no matter how variable. Also, along with other hybrid Billbergias, it has the habit of blooming more than once a year.
In hindsight it is easy to comment but botanically B. enderi has never been linked to B. amoena but more to Quesnelia lateralis a much different looking plant. BUT how can you possibly get three very distinct forms of an alleged species? I have strong suspicions that B. buchholtzii No1 is linked to 'Wendi' or 'Windigig Special' but that is another story.
In 1962 B S Bull.12(3)46. Mulford Foster wrote
B. buchholtzii - This plant does not appear in any listings of commercial growers, but Oakhurst Gardens in southern California has for sale three variations. Whether these belong under the listing of B. buchholtzii is not known. However, the plants so named are very attractive. No. 1 is a dwarf form with brilliant orange-scarlet bracts and deep blue flowers. When well established, it will have several blooming periods a year. No.2 has tall, light green foliage..rose bracts and lavender flowers. No.3 has very attractive leaves of huge size, deep green with bronze shadings and barred transversely with gray. It becomes purplish in the sun. The flowers are violet with pink bracts.
In 1968 BSB 18(1):10 Edward L McWilliams wrote about billbergias and this is what he had to say about B. buchholtzii. "This species is very similar to B. amoena but with petal blade wholly blue. The taxon is often misidentified in the trade."
In 1979 in Flora Neotropica Lyman Smith added the following references to this taxon
Atkinson 44 (? clonotypes GH, US); New York Botanical Garden s n (? clonotypes NY, US).
It seems clear to me that Atkinson was in touch with Lyman Smith as to the true identity of B. buchholtzii but this information was forgotten by or unknown to Evans and Reeves when they purchased these plants ( See Giridlian's article in 1961- above)
In 2000 at the World Bromeliad Conference in San Francisco there were two completely different looking plants with B. buchholtzii on the label which alerted me to a long standing problem that nobody had addressed.
Thanks to the keenness of Rodney Kline who contacted Californian growers we now know that the true B. buchholtzii is being grown by Tom Koerber but there are still other plants with this name in circulation which are incorrectly identified. The only difference I can find between the photograph and the description is the very pale pink sepals compared to green but I have noticed this discrepancy in other billbergias. This plant with its somewhat murky past has never had a photograph published to show you what to look for. This is remedied forthwith with them being on fcbs.org!
This investigation rang bells for me because there seems to be two forms of Billbergia 'Breauteana' ( Or Billbergia 'Chas Webb') in Australia; one with a long inflorescence which well exceeds the leaf tube and with bright red sepals, and the other with a short inflorescence that barely exceeds the leaf tube and the sepals are pale green. The second one could well be Billbergia buchholtzii and if you do have one like this it may well pay to check it against the description above!
